here is an interesting debate in tumblr about Faulcaultian power and non gender areas in Target. to sell marketable products, without a gender gap in , customising the customer. or making the 12 % customer feel out of place in a shop . and the post apocalyptic analysis of post war era motivations.
Also the main issue is that eastern pro - production of anime and manga as the 100 years of non gender specific cartoons, .
That in times of late ,the great represention of the change in western society today is its abilty to catch up to eastern methods of non sexualised products, ( vis- a vis _ star wars of 2016 , verse, star wars of 1974)
but, let us look at the 100 year difference in manga and anime of 1915- to 2015.
1. let us assume the cartoon, or show is for adults and not the new age non gender community is because of the art style, and that is a very shallow argument. ( whichif the cartoons of 1915, were to be recycled into 2015, would not really make any difference, , the stories are still the same,
we live in a post apolalyptic world, of both the past and present situation, bound together ,
1915, and post WW3 of 1990 - to now, the silent cold war .
I can name you at least five shonen manga titles at the drop of a hat that is full of the "pretty non gender" issues that are again recycled from 1915. and it has been happening since 1920 anime manga cartoon books , magazines,
, does that mean that those same 1915 stories could be remarketed to the new age non gender audience of post 2015.
marketed towards non binary? Of course not, because art style is not what determines target audience. education determines the audience, andwe are again, re-educating through media and internet use.
topics of :is that it’s dark and brooding"and :"serious magical pony brony show:, as opposed to the usual happy-go-lucky stuff. This one is borderline sexist. So what, if the show takes its audience seriously and wants to tell a mature story, it’s automatically for adults?
Yeah, why would you want to write a serious story for Adults, that’s just silly, it’s not healthy for a adults to like cosmic horror stories anyway; soon they would start getting ideas and thinking…
well, here we are banned from watching dead pool as children lower than 20 years of age. so there fore, we should be banned form participating in the debate, then .
3. show that, therefore it must be a faulcualtian or freudian story that punishes gender reconstruction ”
Yeah right, because why would we want narrative stakes?
That’s just silly, adults who have superpowers must be always kickass from start to finish,
I am sure that wouldn’t make then get old really quick.
It baffles me that realists assume that just because something bad happens to a adults in a show that automatically means it’s because the author hates adults.
No, adults must always be powerful and nothing bad can ever happen to them and they pensions, tension and stakes be damned.
I could go on, but all in all, it’s just a terrible argument that insults the shopper or viewer’s intelligence. Gross generalization founded on stereotypes and flawed reasoning or departmentalising our shopping centres to make it appropriate to eastern philosphy and de-rule the ruling class. , that’s what this argument is.